Digital Cream

Though this only affects Australia, I still want to highlight the issue as a global one and urge people to take action. I wrote about this in a previous post and unfortunately, nearly three years later, this beast lurches on. In a nutshell, the current coalition (led by the Labor party, the main left party here in Oz) wants to impose two layers of ISP-level net filtering. I fully oppose one and partially oppose the other. They are discussed well at the EFA and the blog Somebody Think Of The Children; I will summarize here. (continued »)

While others have seen online ad revenues slide, online gaming sites (not to be confused with online gambling sites) saw display advertising views spike 29% in November from a year earlier, according to a report released this morning by research firm ComScore…It’s important to note that the survey does not include data from massively multiplayer online games.

You can see the post here.

From MediaPost: Awww yeah… come to me, little ones…

TORONTO-BASED NEW PARADIGM, WHICH IS spending $4 million to study the global “Net Generation,” reported that 77% of the world’s online 16- to-29-year-olds would rather live without television than without the Internet. (continued »)

Teenagers who regularly play online multiplayer games could be benefiting from personal development that does not occur in the ‘real’ world, according to a new study. (continued »)

The leader of the major Left party in Australia, Labor, advocates making it the law that Oz ISPs by default block certain kinds of offensive material, unless otherwise requested by the ISP customer.

I think this is horrid and I oppose Labor’s stance. I am eager to get citizenship so I can speak out on this kind of thing but in the meantime I’ll just try to yammer on to you Aussies who can take action. (continued »)

This article on sweatshops for virtual items makes the quote:

There’s a world of difference between making sneakers and watching bots fight all day. However, they are underpaid, or as Smooth Criminal puts it, “They get paid dirt. But dirt is good where they live.”

I think it’s all bad, and a sign of how badly exploited so many people are in those parts of our world surrounding very lucky people like us who can live and work with dignity and hope.

And it’s worthwhile to keep in mind that even worse, more dangerous, and more unhealthy exploitation is going on right now to make our clothes, electronic equipment, food, and so on.

A tiny but defensible bright spot is that slowly, very slowly, the world may be becoming a better place in this regard. As horrid as this is today, fifty ago I believe it was much worse. But it is shamefully slow and spotty progress that makes me, for one, feel guilt about doing so little to help. As a far luckier society, do we speed this improvement by making minimum living conditions a requirement for trade with a country? Or do we trust the market to slowly improve their lot as competition for workers creeps upward in the developing world?